Skip to content
Technical cover — controlling fan coil units based on occupancy
Energy efficiency & smart buildings

Controlling Fan Coil Units (FCU) Based on Actual Occupancy

Location
Riyadh
Period
2026
Status
In progress
Role
Designing the control strategy and supervising implementation and verification

Overview

Designing an operating strategy based on the actual occupancy of fan coil units using PIR occupancy sensors, so that the system automatically controls operation according to actual presence.

Fan coil units typically operate according to fixed schedules or manual control, so they keep running in empty spaces. Actual occupancy in educational and residential facilities is intermittent by nature, which makes presence-based control far more effective than any fixed schedule.

This initiative belongs to smart buildings more than it belongs to energy efficiency: the result is savings in consumption, but the means is making the building respond to those within it.

Why occupancy, not schedule

A fixed schedule assumes a usage pattern. An occupancy sensor reads actual usage. In spaces with intermittent occupancy, the gap between assumption and reality is itself the amount of waste.

Responsibility

My role

  • Designing the operating strategy and control logic in full.
  • Defining delay and response periods to prevent oscillating operation.
  • Providing engineering supervision of installation and calibration.
  • Verifying that reduced operation did not compromise indoor environmental quality.

Handling

Challenges & actions

Each challenge is linked directly to the action taken and its operational impact.

Challenge

Oscillating operation from transient movement near the sensor.

Action

Tuning on/off delay periods that prevent responding to momentary movement.

Impact

Stable operation without short cycles that stress the equipment.

Challenge

The possibility of thermal comfort being affected when units are switched off.

Action

Defining a minimum operating level and a conditioning period before expected occupancy.

Impact

Maintaining indoor environmental quality while reducing runtime hours.

Summary

Lessons learned

  • 01

    Occupancy-based control fails in practice if the delay periods are not precisely tuned — the logic matters more than the sensor.

  • 02

    Any efficiency measure that touches thermal comfort must have its effect on comfort measured before consumption.

On-site

Photo gallery

Related projects

Energy efficiency & smart buildingsIn progressRiyadh

Separating Residential Buildings from Government Buildings via a Smart Electricity Metering System

An electrical infrastructure project to restructure metering in Faculty Members Housing: a field inventory of feed points and load assessment, and the installation of 1,134 smart meters in coordination with Saudi Energy (SE), with verification that each meter matched its point before approval — giving each building an independent reading on which billing and conservation programs can be built.

Role:Leading execution, coordination with the electricity service provider, and engineering supervision

View project details
Energy efficiency & smart buildingsIn progressRiyadh

Large-Scale Lighting Modernization Program | Specification Review, Illuminance Levels, and Performance

Led the technical review of a campus-wide lighting modernization program covering more than 1,000,000 lighting units: defining luminaire type and color temperature, reviewing specifications and illuminance levels for each space type, calculating expected savings, sequencing execution, and monitoring quality with field verification before approval.

Role:Technical review and approval: specifications, illuminance levels, color temperature, and quality assurance

View project details